Representative Max L. Miller (R-OH-07)

Note: This analysis uses AI to help identify potential outreach strategies for space science issues. Because it uses AI, it is important to understand the sources and limitations of this analysis. Space-related committee assignments (if present), and additional sources (if present), are from congress.gov and a direct output of a targeted web search. Opportunities, challenges, overall summary, and preparation recommendations are products of AI analyses. The biography uses AI to summarize key aspects of the member's Wikipedia page. All AI-generated claims, assessments, and recommendations should be independently verified. This is an experimental feature, and intended to provide guidance and inspiration for outreach strategies for your meeting. Feedback is welcome: casey.dreier@planetary.org.

NASA-related Committee Assignments or Caucuses

Overall Summary

Representative Miller's membership on the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee, where he chairs the Environment Subcommittee, indicates a direct legislative interest in NASA's scientific endeavors, including Earth science. He is a strong advocate for NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) and has actively worked to grow its footprint in Northeast Ohio, which directly supports NASA's science and exploration missions. His district benefits from significant NASA science contracts and grants, including those for microgravity research, planetary science related to Venus, and critical space communications technology that enables scientific data transfer.

While his record demonstrates clear support for NASA's presence and technological development in his district, advocates should emphasize how increased investment in NASA's Science Mission Directorate directly benefits GRC's capabilities and the local aerospace industry. Highlighting the specific science work conducted by companies like Zin Technologies and the Ohio Aerospace Institute, which receive substantial NASA science funding, can underscore the tangible economic and scientific contributions to his constituents. Framing the proposed 47% budget cut as a threat to these local investments and the foundational research that GRC supports could be particularly effective.

Preparation Recommendations

About Max L. Miller

Opportunities

Challenges